Source verified; material sensitivity
Confidence: High
“Among unvaccinated Republican or Republican-leaning participants, a Republican elite endorsement increases vaccination intentions relative to a Democratic elite endorsement.”
This sanitized public case study publishes Peer2Paper's aggregate findings and limitations. Underlying research materials and internal audit records are not redistributed.
Confidence: High
“Among unvaccinated Republican or Republican-leaning participants, a Republican elite endorsement increases vaccination intentions relative to a Democratic elite endorsement.”
The primary source report is verified for its coefficient, interval, test statistic and p value, with explicit limits; this is not an independent statistical replication.
Statistical support changes across verified adjusted and unadjusted analysis paths, although both estimates remain positive.
The primary paper and supplemental documentation conflict about the population included in the analysis.
The canonical audit classified numerical reproduction as not assessable. The public verdict therefore distinguishes verified source reporting, bounded robustness sensitivity and unresolved source conflicts.