A chain of evidence, not a single rerun.
Our workflow separates source understanding, numerical reproduction, robustness analysis and scientific adjudication so each conclusion has a visible basis.
Research and source verification
Identify the primary claim, locate authoritative source material, reconcile versions and record what is present, missing or contradictory.
Outputs: source registry, claim records, paper and code mapsFrozen study case
Turn the question into a versioned case with targets, tolerances, dataset roles, permitted transformations and access constraints.
Outputs: frozen case, artifact registry, evidence graphControlled reproduction
Run the original analysis with captured environment details. Separate technical repairs from scientific changes and preserve every attempt.
Outputs: execution profile, checkpoints, comparison recordsGoverned robustness
Evaluate a bounded registry of defensible choices rather than searching silently for a preferred result.
Outputs: candidate registry, robustness map, fragility findingsIndependent verification
Review numerical and methodological findings independently, resolve conflicts and preserve unresolved objections.
Outputs: review observations, verification receipt, adjudication packageAudience-aware delivery
Produce a decision brief and technical evidence package from the same frozen result, with limitations carried into every view.
Outputs: report, JSON, manifests, replay packageMethodological restraint
Peer2Paper reports what the supplied and verified evidence can support. It does not turn a partial rerun into a global truth claim, treat statistical significance as the only criterion, or hide unresolved access and documentation limits.